Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161
Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX          CASE: PD13 00 161
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2014 0220
Separation Date: 20070618


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Chief Warrant Officer 2 (CW2, 140A / C ommand & Control Systems Technician ) medically separated for a neck and back condition. The CI’s neck and back pain began in 1998. The neck and back conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3/L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The neck and back conditions, characterized as “cervical spondylosis” and “lumbar spondylosis, ” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated “chronic neck pain due to D egenerative D isc D isease (DDD) ” and “chronic back pain due to DDD” as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI writes: “Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Spine/Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine/Residual, TBI/Obstructive Sleep Apnea/PTSD; I had been suffering from severe symptoms of PTSD beginning in my deployment in OIF l. It took several difficult years for me to accept it and seek professional help. I have been on medication since approximately 2008 to help me deal with the symptoms and continue some type of normal lifestyle to include employment. PTSD was not addressed in my pre-screening because I always answered NO to those questions. It was not until I hit rock bottom about a year later, that I was willing to seek professional help. I had moved out and divorced my spouse, struggled with alcoholism and a severe inability to control my anger and emotions. At times I contemplated suicide although I never actually acted on it.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e . ( 2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The contended traumatic brain injury , obstructive sleep apnea , and posttraumatic stress disorder ( PTSD ) conditions are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veteran s Affairs (DVA) , operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers D VA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12 - month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20070518
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Neck Pain 5299-5242 10% DDD, Cervical Spine 5010-5237* 10% 20071029
Chronic Back Pain 5299-5242 0% DDD, Lumbar Spine 5010-5237* 10% 20071029
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 0 20071029
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20071126 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). *VARD of 20100908 changed codes to 5243.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

 Chronic Neck Pain Condition . The CI developed a gradual onset of atraumatic neck pain in 1998. The CI was seen while in Theater for worsening of his low back pain (LBP); however the examiner also noted muscle tightness in his neck. A cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam demonstrated DDD and bony spurs at C5-6, 6-7 and C7-T1 with right sided disc protrusion at C5-6 which appears to slightly displace the nerve root. The CI was given a permanent U3L3 profile for cervical and lumbar DDD with specific restrictions of no Kevlar, no LBE, no Interceptor Body Armor (IBA), no side straddle hops and no flutter kicks. The c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI’s profile prevented him from performing his MOS duties. There was a bubble inclinometer measurement of flexion and extension performed by physical therapy (PT) on 16 March 2007, 3 months prior to separation. They were recorded as flexion 15 degrees (unknown normal range) and extension 21 degrees (unknown normal range) with pain. Additionally, there was no specification if dual or single method inclinometer measurements were used, and the placement of the inclinometer, or normal values. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam on 23 April 2007 , approximately 2 months prior to separation , documented cervical spondylosis and the examiner rated the pain according to the American Medical Association (AMA) pain scale at mild to moderate and frequent to constant. Examination showed spasm of neck, and tenderness, normal 5/5 strength and sensation of the upper extremities, normal reflexes. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 29 October 2007, approximately 4 months after separation , indicated that the CI continued to have daily dull achy back pain which became sharp with movement and the pain intensity was 5 out of 10 with 10 being the worst. The applicant had not suffered periods of incapacitation as a result of his neck or back pain, did not wear a neck or back brace. He was unemployed, and able to perform all the usual activities of daily living without assistance. Physical examination revealed normal gait and posture, normal position of head, normal curvature of spine. Range - of - motion (ROM) with goniometer in degrees was flexion 40 degrees (normal 45) with mild discomfort, extension 45 degrees (normal 45), without discomfort; left and right lateral 40 degrees (normal 45), with mild discomfort, left and right lateral rotation was 70 degrees (normal 80) with mild discomfort. Painful motion was noted without acute spasm, weakness or tenderness.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the chronic neck pain condition as 5299 (analogous to) - 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) rated at 10%. The VA coded the DDD, cervical spine condition as 5010 (arthritis, due to trauma), substantiated by X-ray findings with to 5237 (lumbosacral or cervical strain) rated at 10%. The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease. The PT evaluation performed approximately a month prior to the MEB NARSUM and approximately 3 months prior to separation demonstrated all ROM limited by pain and performed a ROM examination using a bubble inclinometer. However, the examiner did not specify the placement of the device or whether a dual inclinometer method was used. Flexion was reported to be 15 degrees which was not consistent with the subsequent VA C&P examination (flexion 40 degrees, combined 305 degrees). The Board considered the physical therapy ROM performed prior to separation but noted it was performed by a methodology that did not conform to the VASRD rating formula, which is based on a goniometric measurement of cervical motion from the vertical plane. The results were not consistent with the conforming VA examination and were not consistent with the known pathology. Therefore, the Board concluded the VA C&P examination performed 4 months after separation was the most probative and reflective of the disability at the time of separation. The Board then considered the general rating formula for diseased and injuries of the spine for rating the condition under the codes used by the PEB and the VA. There was evidence of forward flexion greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 40 degrees (measured at 40 degrees with goniometer), for a rating of 10%. Without evidence of incapacitating episodes, abnormal gait, weakness of the extremities, severe muscle spasm, there was no route to a higher rating under alternate codes.

Chronic Back Pain Condition: The CI developed atraumatic LBP in 1998. He was seen for an intermittent popping sensation to the midline spine at L3-4. A lumbar spine X- ray performed in January 2003 was normal. The CI continued with back pain and intermittent tingling which radiated intermittently to the perineum ; however , there was no radicular pain, nor incontinence. An MRI showed DDD/dessication at L4-5 and posterior central disc protrusion, and mild to moderate bilateral facet joint hypertrophy at L4-5 causing slight symmetrical narrowing of both neural foramen. A repeat lumbar spine MRI in August 2004 reported unchanged findings. In September 2005, the CI was evaluated by PT for the LBP and was given a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation ( TENS ) unit for electrical stimulation therapy. The m edical examiner evaluated the CI for a low back flare and prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and a muscle relaxant. In May 2006, the CI was seen in the Medical Clinic for a week of constant dull lumbar pain in the morning and at night. A physical exam finding was an antalgic gait with tripoding. He was advised to continue the NSAID, muscle relaxant, analgesic and physical therapy ( PT ) . The CI was seen while in Theater for worsening of his LBP while wearing gear. Physical exam findings were tenderness to palpation , at spinous process at L4 abnormal spine motion and muscle spasms. The examiner diagnosed muscle spasm and lumbar DDD L4-5 and changed the muscle relaxant and administered an NSAID injection. A lumbar spine MRI showed significant right lateral disc protrusion at L5-S1 with right sided foraminal narrowing on possible right sided L5 foraminal nerve root encroachment, small focal right paracentral disc protrusion at L4-5 but no clear effect on the nerve root. The CI was given a permanent U3L3 Profile for cervical and lumbar DDD with specific restrictions of no Kevlar, no LBE, no IBA, no side straddle hops and no flutter kicks. The c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI’s profile prevented him from performing his MOS duties. The PT note on 16   March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain. The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007 , approximately 2 months prior to separation , documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory drugs, and PT and pain medications without any improvement. The examiner rated the pain according to the AMA pain scale at mild to moderate and frequent to constant without radicular symptoms . Physical examination revealed muscle spasm and back tenderness, negative straight leg rise, normal 5/5 lower extremity strength, normal sensation, normal deep tendon reflexes . The VA C&P exam 4 months after separation indicated that the CI continued to have daily dull achy back pain which became sharp with movement and the pain intensity was 7 out of 10 with 10 being the worst. Physical examination revealed normal posture and gait, normal curvature of the spine, normal symmetry and appearance , painful motion without acute spasm, weakness, or tenderness. ROM of the thoracolumbar spine showed flexion of 80 degrees (normal 90), with moderate discomfort; extension of 30 degrees (normal 30), with moderate discomfort, left and right lateral flexion of 25 degrees (normal 30) with moderated discomfort, and left and right lateral rotation of 30 degrees (normal 30), without discomfort. There was evidence of painful motion, without spasm, weakness , or tenderness .

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the c hronic b ack p ain condition as 5299 analogous to 5242 Degenerative arthritis of the spine and rated a t 0%. The VA coded the DDD, l umbar s pine condition as 5010 a rthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings with to 5237 l umbosacral or cervical strain and rated at 10%. The g eneral r ating f ormula for d iseases and i njuries of the s pine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The MEB used ROM’s from the P T evaluation performed approximately a month prior to the MEB NARSUM and approximately 3 mont hs prior to separation. As discussed above, the PT evaluation was performed with a bubble incli nometer and the VA C&P examination with a goniometer, which complies with VASRD standards for rating the thoracolumbar spine. The results were not consistent with the conforming VA examination, and were not consistent with the known pathology. Therefore, the Board concluded the VA C&P examination performed 4 months after separation was the most probative and reflective of the disability at the time of separation. The Board then considered the general rating formula for diseased and injuries of the spine for rating the condition under the codes used by the PEB and the VA. There was evidence of forward flexion greater than 60 degrees but not greater than 85 degrees (measured at 80 degrees with goniometer), for a rating of 10%. Without evidence of incapacitating episodes, abnormal gait, weakness of the extremities, severe muscle spasm, there was no route to a higher rating under alternate codes.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the c hronic n eck p ain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 1 0 %, coded 5299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the c hronic b ack p ain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 1 0%, coded 5299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Neck Pain 5299-5242 10%
Chronic Back Pain 5299-5242 10%
COMBINED 20%
invalid font number 31502

invalid font number 31502


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 2 130409 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 invalid font number 31502 SAMR-RB                                                                         

invalid font number 31502
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 invalid font number 31502 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
invalid font number 31502 for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502 , AR20140013237 (PD201300161)

 invalid font number 31502
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:


 invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00409

    Original file (PD2013 00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The chronic back pain and chronic neck pain conditions, characterized as “chronic neck pain and chronic back pain, with degenerative disc disease” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that his case may be eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of his MH condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01525

    Original file (PD-2014-01525.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for cervical degenerative disease (neck pain) and another medical condition, with a Code C and specific restrictions noted on the profile.The VA C&P exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00698

    Original file (PD2013 00698.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ; No muscle spasm invalid font number 31502 Also noted in evidence was a VA PT exam dated 13 months after separation that documented “Trunk ROM is limited 50% flexion, lateral flexion left and 25% rotation left. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD, scoliosis and strain condition as 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine, rated at 20% based on a forward flexion of 40 degrees.The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02571

    Original file (PD-2013-02571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a pain managementevaluation on 11 March 2005 the CI reported no upper extremity symptoms and there was reduced cervical ROM with normal strength and TTP of the cervical spine (facet pain), with positive evidence of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00261

    Original file (PD-2014-00261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Herniated Disc L4-5 with DDD524320%Lumbar Spine Strain523740%20070829Sciatic Nerve with L1-4 RL Radiculopathy852020%20070829Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x920070829 Combined: 20%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20071023 (most proximate to date of separation) invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00909

    Original file (PD-2014-00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board next considered if there was evidence of a functionally impairing radiculopathy due to the low back condition to provide additional rating. The Board considered the evidence in record supports thatthe CI’s...